Q: Why have only men been great enlightened masters? why not women?

A: One of the reasons is this, that man is an extrovert; he can express himself well. He is a peacock; the woman is a peahen. She can know, she can feel, she can be, but when the point of expression comes she is utterly at a loss. And this is not only so with the ultimate experience but in other experiences too. A woman finds it very difficult to say, 'I love you'; a man finds it very easy. Even when he doesn't feel much love he can say, 'I love you'. And the woman, even when she is full of love, remains silent about it; it has to be felt by the other. The woman respects the inner experience so much that all expression seems a little vulgar. That's why there have not been great women masters: not that there have not been great enlightened women; there have been.


Disclaimer: All views and options expressed on these pages are not that of the creator of this blog. They belong to Osho. You, the reader, is free to agree or disagree or sit on the fence. If any of the material offends you,
1. Stop being too sensitive and not let someones opinion get to you, or
2. Take the issue up with Osho directly, or
3. Contact Blogger.com and have the page removed.
Either way the creator of this blog will not entertain any correspondence.
Capisce? Thank you.